↓ Skip to main content

Imaging the Seattle Fault Zone with high-resolution seismic tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Imaging the Seattle Fault Zone with high-resolution seismic tomography
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, June 2001
DOI 10.1029/2000gl012778
Authors

Andrew J. Calvert, Michael A. Fisher

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 71%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Engineering 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2012.
All research outputs
#5,984,776
of 18,404,646 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#7,940
of 17,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,442
of 402,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#152
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,404,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,338 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.