You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Combining aortic arch dissection stent implantation and root surgery for aortic dissection type A
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, February 2023
Moritz Benjamin Immohr, Arash Mehdiani, Sebastian Johannes Bauer, Hayato Ise, Yukiharu Sugimura, Artur Lichtenberg, Payam Akhyari
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||18||62%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||6||21%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||1||17%|
|Student > Postgraduate||1||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||2||33%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,350,163 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
of 1,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 449,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,350,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,325 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.