↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptome analysis reveals nuclear-encoded proteins for the maintenance of temporary plastids in the dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptome analysis reveals nuclear-encoded proteins for the maintenance of temporary plastids in the dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuminata
Published in
BMC Genomics, June 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-11-366
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer H Wisecaver, Jeremiah D Hackett

Abstract

Dinophysis is exceptional among dinoflagellates, possessing plastids derived from cryptophyte algae. Although Dinophysis can be maintained in pure culture for several months, the genus is mixotrophic and needs to feed either to acquire plastids (a process known as kleptoplastidy) or obtain growth factors necessary for plastid maintenance. Dinophysis does not feed directly on cryptophyte algae, but rather on a ciliate (Myrionecta rubra) that has consumed the cryptophytes and retained their plastids. Despite the apparent absence of cryptophyte nuclear genes required for plastid function, Dinophysis can retain cryptophyte plastids for months without feeding.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 19%
Student > Master 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 14%
Environmental Science 14 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,215,771
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,533
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,506
of 104,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#10
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.