↓ Skip to main content

Common variants in WFS1 confer risk of type 2 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Common variants in WFS1 confer risk of type 2 diabetes
Published in
Nature Genetics, July 2007
DOI 10.1038/ng2067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manjinder S Sandhu, Michael N Weedon, Katherine A Fawcett, Jon Wasson, Sally L Debenham, Allan Daly, Hana Lango, Timothy M Frayling, Rosalind J Neumann, Richard Sherva, Ilana Blech, Paul D Pharoah, Colin N A Palmer, Charlotte Kimber, Roger Tavendale, Andrew D Morris, Mark I McCarthy, Mark Walker, Graham Hitman, Benjamin Glaser, M Alan Permutt, Andrew T Hattersley, Nicholas J Wareham, Inês Barroso

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 142 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 20%
Student > Master 15 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 7%
Other 11 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Mathematics 2 1%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 31 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,134,109
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,813
of 7,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,432
of 81,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#18
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.