↓ Skip to main content

Identification of loci associated with schizophrenia by genome-wide association and follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Genetics, July 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
5 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
964 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
624 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of loci associated with schizophrenia by genome-wide association and follow-up
Published in
Nature Genetics, July 2008
DOI 10.1038/ng.201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael C O'Donovan, Nicholas Craddock, Nadine Norton, Hywel Williams, Timothy Peirce, Valentina Moskvina, Ivan Nikolov, Marian Hamshere, Liam Carroll, Lyudmila Georgieva, Sarah Dwyer, Peter Holmans, Jonathan L Marchini, Chris C A Spencer, Bryan Howie, Hin-Tak Leung, Annette M Hartmann, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Derek W Morris, YongYong Shi, GuoYin Feng, Per Hoffmann, Peter Propping, Catalina Vasilescu, Wolfgang Maier, Marcella Rietschel, Stanley Zammit, Johannes Schumacher, Emma M Quinn, Thomas G Schulze, Nigel M Williams, Ina Giegling, Nakao Iwata, Masashi Ikeda, Ariel Darvasi, Sagiv Shifman, Lin He, Jubao Duan, Alan R Sanders, Douglas F Levinson, Pablo V Gejman, Sven Cichon, Markus M Nöthen, Michael Gill, Aiden Corvin, Dan Rujescu, George Kirov, Michael J Owen

Abstract

We carried out a genome-wide association study of schizophrenia (479 cases, 2,937 controls) and tested loci with P < 10(-5) in up to 16,726 additional subjects. Of 12 loci followed up, 3 had strong independent support (P < 5 x 10(-4)), and the overall pattern of replication was unlikely to occur by chance (P = 9 x 10(-8)). Meta-analysis provided strongest evidence for association around ZNF804A (P = 1.61 x 10(-7)) and this strengthened when the affected phenotype included bipolar disorder (P = 9.96 x 10(-9)).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 624 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
United Kingdom 12 2%
Germany 6 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 580 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 128 21%
Researcher 107 17%
Student > Bachelor 75 12%
Student > Master 57 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 47 8%
Other 127 20%
Unknown 83 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 181 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 106 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 65 10%
Neuroscience 65 10%
Psychology 57 9%
Other 49 8%
Unknown 101 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2013.
All research outputs
#1,477,444
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#2,177
of 7,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,634
of 81,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#10
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,176 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.