Title |
Reprogramming Cancer into Antigen Presenting Cells as a Novel Immunotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Discovery, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0502 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Miles H. Linde, Amy C. Fan, Thomas Kohnke, Aaron C. Trotman-Grant, Sarah F. Gurev, Paul Phan, Feifei Zhao, Naomi L. Haddock, Kevin A. Nuno, Eric J. Gars, Melissa Stafford, Payton L. Marshall, Christopher G. Dove, Ian L. Linde, Niklas Landberg, Lindsay P. Miller, Robbie G. Majzner, Tian Yi. Zhang, Ravindra Majeti |
Abstract |
Therapeutic cancer vaccination seeks to elicit activation of tumor-reactive T cells capable of recognizing tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and eradicating malignant cells. Here, we present a cancer vaccination approach utilizing myeloid lineage reprogramming to directly convert cancer cells into tumor reprogrammed-antigen presenting cells (TR-APCs). Using syngeneic murine leukemia models, we demonstrate that TR-APCs acquire both myeloid phenotype and function, process and present endogenous TAAs, and potently stimulate TAA-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. In vivo TR-APC induction elicits clonal expansion of cancer-specific T cells, establishes cancer-specific immune memory, and ultimately promotes leukemia eradication. We further show that both hematologic cancers and solid tumors, including sarcomas and carcinomas, are amenable to myeloid-lineage reprogramming into TR-APCs. Finally, we demonstrate the clinical applicability of this approach by generating TR-APCs from primary clinical specimens and stimulating autologous patient-derived T cells. Thus, TR-APCs represent a cancer vaccination therapeutic strategy with broad implications for clinical immuno-oncology. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 27 | 26% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
France | 3 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
India | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Georgia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 52 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 53 | 50% |
Scientists | 41 | 39% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |