↓ Skip to main content

Hydrologic and atmospheric models: The (continuing) problem of discordant scales

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, August 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrologic and atmospheric models: The (continuing) problem of discordant scales
Published in
Climatic Change, August 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01096266
Authors

S. W. Hostetler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 38%
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Master 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 38%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 24%
Engineering 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,911,788
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,335
of 5,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,756
of 21,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.