You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A randomised controlled trial of blended learning to improve the newborn examination skills of medical students
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301252 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alice Stewart, Garry Inglis, Luke Jardine, Pieter Koorts, Mark William Davies |
Abstract |
To evaluate the hypotheses that a blended learning approach would improve the newborn examination skills of medical students and yield a higher level of satisfaction with learning newborn examination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 96 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
Researcher | 11 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Professor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 25% |
Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 39% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
Psychology | 7 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 8% |
Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#1,025
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,820
of 180,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.