↓ Skip to main content

Chinese nuclear weapons, 2023

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,173)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
110 news outlets
twitter
189 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese nuclear weapons, 2023
Published in
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March 2023
DOI 10.1080/00963402.2023.2178713
Authors

Hans M. Kristensen, Matt Korda, Eliana Reynolds

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 189 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 992. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#14,471
of 23,932,398 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#1
of 1,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#439
of 422,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,932,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them