↓ Skip to main content

ワニの筋学 : -古脊椎動物学者に必要な解剖- I.上顎,下顎

Overview of attention for article published in Fossils, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ワニの筋学 : -古脊椎動物学者に必要な解剖- I.上顎,下顎
Published in
Fossils, October 2008
DOI 10.14825/kaseki.84.0_96
Authors

鈴木 大輔, 林 昭次

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Fossils
#95
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,005
of 101,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fossils
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.