| Title |
A beginner’s guide to evidencing your teaching practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Biochemist, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1042/bio_2023_110 |
| Authors |
David Smith, Katharine Hubbard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 56 | 58% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 52% |
| Scientists | 37 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 33% |
| Other | 1 | 33% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#617,573
of 24,871,898 outputs
Outputs from The Biochemist
#9
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,566
of 408,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Biochemist
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,871,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.