↓ Skip to main content

Hyperinvasive approach to out-of hospital cardiac arrest using mechanical chest compression device, prehospital intraarrest cooling, extracorporeal life support and early invasive assessment compared…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperinvasive approach to out-of hospital cardiac arrest using mechanical chest compression device, prehospital intraarrest cooling, extracorporeal life support and early invasive assessment compared to standard of care. A randomized parallel groups comparative study proposal. “Prague OHCA study”
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1186/1479-5876-10-163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jan Belohlavek, Karel Kucera, Jiri Jarkovsky, Ondrej Franek, Milana Pokorna, Jiri Danda, Roman Skripsky, Vit Kandrnal, Martin Balik, Jan Kunstyr, Jan Horak, Ondrej Smid, Jaroslav Valasek, Vratislav Mrazek, Zdenek Schwarz, Ales Linhart

Abstract

Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has a poor outcome. Recent non-randomized studies of ECLS (extracorporeal life support) in OHCA suggested further prospective multicenter studies to define population that would benefit from ECLS. We aim to perform a prospective randomized study comparing prehospital intraarrest hypothermia combined with mechanical chest compression device, intrahospital ECLS and early invasive investigation and treatment in all patients with OHCA of presumed cardiac origin compared to a standard of care.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 95 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Unspecified 11 10%
Other 10 10%
Other 37 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 66%
Unspecified 18 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 8 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2018.
All research outputs
#725,261
of 12,988,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#110
of 2,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,503
of 147,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,988,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them