↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Persons With Non-specific Low Back Pain With and Without Radiculopathy: Identification of Best Evidence for Rehabilitation to Develop the WHO's…

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
78 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Persons With Non-specific Low Back Pain With and Without Radiculopathy: Identification of Best Evidence for Rehabilitation to Develop the WHO's Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation
Published in
Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, March 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.02.022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Zaina, Pierre Côté, Carolina Cancelliere, Francesca Di Felice, Sabrina Donzelli, Alexandra Rauch, Leslie Verville, Stefano Negrini, Margareta Nordin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 11%
Other 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Unspecified 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 59 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 12%
Unspecified 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 64 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2024.
All research outputs
#949,327
of 26,617,554 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#139
of 6,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,317
of 432,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
#4
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,617,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.