↓ Skip to main content

Hydrodynamic turbulence cannot transport angular momentum effectively in astrophysical disks

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
patent
4 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
211 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrodynamic turbulence cannot transport angular momentum effectively in astrophysical disks
Published in
Nature, November 2006
DOI 10.1038/nature05323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hantao Ji, Michael Burin, Ethan Schartman, Jeremy Goodman

Abstract

The most efficient energy sources known in the Universe are accretion disks. Those around black holes convert 5-40 per cent of rest-mass energy to radiation. Like water circling a drain, inflowing mass must lose angular momentum, presumably by vigorous turbulence in disks, which are essentially inviscid. The origin of the turbulence is unclear. Hot disks of electrically conducting plasma can become turbulent by way of the linear magnetorotational instability. Cool disks, such as the planet-forming disks of protostars, may be too poorly ionized for the magnetorotational instability to occur, and therefore essentially unmagnetized and linearly stable. Nonlinear hydrodynamic instability often occurs in linearly stable flows (for example, pipe flows) at sufficiently large Reynolds numbers. Although planet-forming disks have extreme Reynolds numbers, keplerian rotation enhances their linear hydrodynamic stability, so the question of whether they can be turbulent and thereby transport angular momentum effectively is controversial. Here we report a laboratory experiment, demonstrating that non-magnetic quasi-keplerian flows at Reynolds numbers up to millions are essentially steady. Scaled to accretion disks, rates of angular momentum transport lie far below astrophysical requirements. By ruling out purely hydrodynamic turbulence, our results indirectly support the magnetorotational instability as the likely cause of turbulence, even in cool disks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Australia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
China 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 76 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 36%
Researcher 21 25%
Professor 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 3 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 65 77%
Engineering 9 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Chemistry 1 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,640,896
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,519
of 93,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,909
of 70,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#113
of 514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 93,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.