↓ Skip to main content

Hunter-gatherer admixture facilitated natural selection in Neolithic European farmers

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
174 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
106 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hunter-gatherer admixture facilitated natural selection in Neolithic European farmers
Published in
Current Biology, April 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Davy, Dan Ju, Iain Mathieson, Pontus Skoglund

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 106 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1381. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,069
of 23,839,820 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#83
of 14,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243
of 408,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#6
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,839,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.