↓ Skip to main content

EFEITOS GÊNICOS, HETEROSE E DEPRESSÃO ENDOGÂMICA EM CARACTERES DE SORGO FORRAGEIRO

Overview of attention for article published in Bragantia, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EFEITOS GÊNICOS, HETEROSE E DEPRESSÃO ENDOGÂMICA EM CARACTERES DE SORGO FORRAGEIRO
Published in
Bragantia, January 1998
DOI 10.1590/s0006-87051998000100010
Authors

CARLOS ALBERTO SCAPIM, JOSÉ AVELINO SANTOS RODRIGUES, COSME DAMIÃO CRUZ, PAULO ROBERTO CECON, JOSÉ IVO RIBEIRO JÚNIOR, ALESSANDRO DE LUCCA BRACCINI

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2013.
All research outputs
#3,894,601
of 4,654,880 outputs
Outputs from Bragantia
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,973
of 89,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bragantia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,654,880 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them