By what molecular mechanisms do social determinants impact cardiometabolic risk?
Clinical Science, March 2023
Yvonne Baumer, Mario A. Pita, Andrew S. Baez, Lola R. Ortiz-Whittingham, Manuel A. Cintron, Rebecca R. Rose, Veronica C. Gray, Foster Osei Baah, Tiffany M. Powell-Wiley
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||47||73%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||7||11%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||2||25%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||13%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||38%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||3||38%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||13%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,891,087 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Science
of 2,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 408,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Science
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,891,087 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.