You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Role of root hair elongation in rhizosheath aggregation and in the carbon flow into the soil
Biology and Fertility of Soils, March 2023
Pedro Paulo C. Teixeira, Svenja Trautmann, Franz Buegger, Vincent J. M. N. L. Felde, Johanna Pausch, Carsten W. Müller, Ingrid Kögel-Knabner
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||10||40%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||4%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||4%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||1||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||13%|
|Student > Master||1||13%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||25%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,079,942 outputs
Outputs from Biology and Fertility of Soils
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 407,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology and Fertility of Soils
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,079,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them