The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An Insight of Quinclorac Resistance Mechanism in Early Watergrass ( Echinochloa oryzoides )
|
---|---|
Published in |
Planta Daninha, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.51694/advweedsci/2022;40:00009 |
Authors |
Muhammad Zia Ul Haq, Zheng Zhang, Sheng Qiang, Ramala Masood Ahmad, Dina Abdulmajid, Muhammad Fiaz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 25% |
Brazil | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#15,161,426
of 26,432,239 outputs
Outputs from Planta Daninha
#65
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,136
of 531,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta Daninha
#15
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,432,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.