You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ethics of college vaccine mandates, using reasonable comparisons
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Ethics, March 2023
|
DOI | 10.1136/jme-2022-108852 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leo L Lam, Taylor Nichols |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 828 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 120 | 14% |
United States | 102 | 12% |
Canada | 40 | 5% |
Australia | 22 | 3% |
India | 5 | <1% |
Comoros | 4 | <1% |
Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
Ireland | 3 | <1% |
South Africa | 3 | <1% |
Other | 33 | 4% |
Unknown | 493 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 745 | 90% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 43 | 5% |
Scientists | 30 | 4% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 10 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 543. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2023.
All research outputs
#46,154
of 25,836,587 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#19
of 3,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,213
of 425,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#1
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,836,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.