You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant-based coagulants for food industry wastewater treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Water Process Engineering, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103525 |
| Authors |
Jonas Raul Balbinoti, Ricardo Egídio dos Santos Junior, Letícia Bernal Ferreira de Sousa, Fatima de Jesus Bassetti, Thaisa Carvalho Volpe Balbinoti, Luiz Mário de Matos Jorge, Regina Maria Matos Jorge |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,930,453
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Water Process Engineering
#26
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,296
of 235,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Water Process Engineering
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.