You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sciatic nerve regeneration in rats by a promising electrospun collagen/poly(ε-caprolactone) nerve conduit with tailored degradation rate
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Neuroscience, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2202-12-68 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wenwen Yu, Wen Zhao, Chao Zhu, Xiuli Zhang, Dongxia Ye, Wenjie Zhang, Yong Zhou, Xinquan Jiang, Zhiyuan Zhang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 159 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 22% |
Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
Researcher | 24 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 14% |
Unknown | 31 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 29 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 14% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 13% |
Materials Science | 20 | 12% |
Chemistry | 8 | 5% |
Other | 30 | 18% |
Unknown | 36 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,826,831
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neuroscience
#46
of 1,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,624
of 117,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neuroscience
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,247 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.