↓ Skip to main content

Early C-reactive protein kinetics predicts immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer in the phase III OAK trial

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI Cancer Spectrum, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Early C-reactive protein kinetics predicts immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer in the phase III OAK trial
Published in
JNCI Cancer Spectrum, April 2023
DOI 10.1093/jncics/pkad027
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonas Saal, Tobias Bald, Markus Eckstein, Manuel Ritter, Peter Brossart, Jörg Ellinger, Michael Hölzel, Niklas Klümper

Abstract

Static biomarkers like PD-L1 are insufficient to accurately predict response to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Therefore, on-treatment biomarkers, that measure immediate therapy-associated changes, are currently shifting into the focus of immuno-oncology. A prime example of a simple predictive on-treatment biomarker is the early C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics with its predictive CRP flare-response phenomenon. Here, we were able to confirm the predictive value of CRP-flare response kinetics in the pivotal phase 3 OAK trial (NCT02008227), which compared atezolizumab with docetaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Of note, CRP flare-response predicted favorable outcomes only in the ICI-treated subgroup, which suggests that it is an immunotherapy-specific phenomenon. In conclusion, we have for the first time validated the high predictive value of early CRP kinetics in a pivotal phase 3 trial, justifying the broad use of this cost-effective and easy-to-implement on-treatment biomarker to optimize therapy monitoring for patients with NSCLC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,111,269
of 24,721,757 outputs
Outputs from JNCI Cancer Spectrum
#158
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,306
of 406,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI Cancer Spectrum
#9
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,721,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.