↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Methods that Combine Multiple Randomized Trials to Estimate Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Overview of attention for article published in arXiv, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Methods that Combine Multiple Randomized Trials to Estimate Heterogeneous Treatment Effects
Published in
arXiv, March 2023
Authors

Carly Lupton Brantner, Trang Quynh Nguyen, Tengjie Tang, Congwen Zhao, Hwanhee Hong, Elizabeth A. Stuart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 100%
Unspecified 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,402,752
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from arXiv
#170,689
of 915,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,102
of 421,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from arXiv
#5,841
of 35,230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915,717 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35,230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.