You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Using Health Smart Cards to Check Drug Allergy History: The Perspective from Taiwan’s Experiences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Systems, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10916-009-9391-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Min-Huei Hsu, Ju-Chuan Yen, Wen-Ta Chiu, Shu-Ling Tsai, Chien-Tsai Liu, Yu-Chuan Li |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 7% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 29% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,812,193
of 24,089,177 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Systems
#172
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,725
of 97,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Systems
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,089,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them