↓ Skip to main content

ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 5,737)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1038 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2023
DOI 10.1007/s00134-023-07033-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Antoni Torres, Blin Nagavci, Stefano Aliberti, Massimo Antonelli, Matteo Bassetti, Lieuwe D. Bos, James D. Chalmers, Lennie Derde, Jan de Waele, Jose Garnacho-Montero, Marin Kollef, Carlos M. Luna, Rosario Menendez, Michael S. Niederman, Dmitry Ponomarev, Marcos I. Restrepo, David Rigau, Marcus J. Schultz, Emmanuel Weiss, Tobias Welte, Richard Wunderink

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,038 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 284 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 41 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Student > Postgraduate 21 7%
Researcher 20 7%
Student > Master 10 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 137 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 1%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 137 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 672. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2024.
All research outputs
#34,176
of 26,744,825 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#22
of 5,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#890
of 433,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,744,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.