↓ Skip to main content

Can We Better Prioritize Resources for Cost-Utility Research?

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Decision Making, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can We Better Prioritize Resources for Cost-Utility Research?
Published in
Medical Decision Making, September 2016
DOI 10.1177/0272989x05276853
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. Neumann, Allison B. Rosen, Dan Greenberg, Natalia V. Olchanski, Richa Pande, Richard H. Chapman, Patricia W. Stone, Silvia Ondategui-Parra, John Nadai, Joanna E. Siegel, Milton C. Weinstein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 6%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,494,138
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Medical Decision Making
#704
of 1,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,633
of 335,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Decision Making
#35
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,371 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.