↓ Skip to main content

Can we better prioritize resources for cost-utility research?

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Decision Making, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can we better prioritize resources for cost-utility research?
Published in
Medical Decision Making, July 2005
DOI 10.1177/0272989x05276853
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. Neumann, Allison B. Rosen, Dan Greenberg, Natalia V. Olchanski, Richa Pande, Richard H. Chapman, Patricia W. Stone, Silvia Ondategui-Parra, John Nadai, Joanna E. Siegel, Milton C. Weinstein, P. J. Neumann

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 28%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 12 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#1,728,917
of 7,268,637 outputs
Outputs from Medical Decision Making
#239
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,334
of 217,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Decision Making
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,268,637 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.