You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Manual action expectation and biomechanical ability in three species of New World monkey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2023.03.023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elias Garcia-Pelegrin, Rachael Miller, Clive Wilkins, Nicola S. Clayton |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 198 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 18 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 6% |
| United States | 10 | 5% |
| Mexico | 9 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 124 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 161 | 81% |
| Scientists | 27 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 20% |
| Psychology | 2 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1569. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,784
of 24,466,750 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#70
of 14,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206
of 388,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#6
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,466,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,312 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.