The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mesozoic California and the Underflow of Pacific Mantle
|
---|---|
Published in |
Geological Society of America Bulletin, January 1969
|
DOI | 10.1130/0016-7606(1969)80[2409:mcatuo]2.0.co;2 |
Authors |
WARREN HAMILTON |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
Researcher | 6 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 40 | 78% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,714,724
of 26,245,199 outputs
Outputs from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#972
of 2,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#523
of 13,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geological Society of America Bulletin
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,199 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.