↓ Skip to main content

The Lutzomyia longipalpis complex: a brief natural history of aggregation-sex pheromone communication

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Lutzomyia longipalpis complex: a brief natural history of aggregation-sex pheromone communication
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13071-016-1866-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina N. Spiegel, Denise B. dos Santos Dias, Alejandra S. Araki, James G. C. Hamilton, Reginaldo P. Brazil, Théresa M. Jones

Abstract

In this paper we review the natural history of pheromone communication and the current diversity of aggregation-sex pheromones in the sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis. This species complex is the main vector of Leishmania infantum, the agent of visceral leishmaniasis in the Americas. The identification of variation in pheromone chemotypes combined with molecular and sound analyses have all contributed to our understanding of the extent of divergence among cryptic members of this complex. The importance of chemical signals as pre-mating barriers and drivers of speciation is discussed. Moreover, the importance of aggregation-sex pheromones as sexually selected signals is highlighted with evidence from the literature suggesting their potential role in species and mate recognition as well as mate assessment. The distinct evolutionary forces possibly involved are briefly reviewed and discussed in the context of this intriguing insect.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,721,773
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#560
of 5,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,473
of 307,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#11
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.