You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Air versus oxygen for resuscitation of infants at birth
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002273.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anton Tan, Andreas A Schulze, Colm PF O'Donnell, Peter G Davis |
Abstract |
100% oxygen is the commonly recommended gas for the resuscitation of infants at birth. There is growing evidence from both animal and human studies that room air is as effective as 100% oxygen and that 100% oxygen may have adverse effects on breathing physiology and cerebral circulation. There is also the theoretical risk of tissue damage due to free oxygen radicals when 100% oxygen is given. The use of room air has, therefore, been suggested as a safer and possibly more effective alternative. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
Researcher | 12 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 20% |
Unknown | 39 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 34% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 10% |
Unknown | 43 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,069,532
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,705
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,002
of 69,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.