↓ Skip to main content

Effect of lumbar spinal manipulation on local and remote pressure pain threshold and pinprick sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals: a randomised trial

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of lumbar spinal manipulation on local and remote pressure pain threshold and pinprick sensitivity in asymptomatic individuals: a randomised trial
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12998-016-0128-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sasha L. Dorron, Barrett E. Losco, Peter D. Drummond, Bruce F. Walker

Abstract

The mechanisms of clinical pain relief associated with spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) are poorly understood. Our objective was to determine whether lumbar high-velocity low-amplitude SMT altered pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pinprick sensitivity (PPS) locally and remotely, how long any change lasted (up to 30 min), and whether changes related to the side of SMT. Thirty-four asymptomatic participants (mean age 22.6 years ±4.0) received a right- or left-sided lumbar SMT. PPT and PPS were measured bilaterally at the calf, lumbar spine, scapula, and forehead before and immediately, 10, 20, and 30 min after intervention. Data were collected between October 2014 and June 2015. Bilateral calf and lumbar spine PPT increased significantly after 10 - 20 min and was maintained at 30 min (7.2-11.8 % increase). PPS decreased significantly in all locations at various times (9.8 - 22.5 % decrease). At the calf and lumbar spine, PPT increased slightly more ipsilateral to the SMT than contralateral. Lumbar SMT reduced deep pressure sensitivity locally and in the lower limbs for at least 30 min, whereas sensitivity to pinprick was reduced systemically. These findings suggest that SMT specifically inhibits deep pressure sensitivity distally. These findings are novel compared to other lumbar SMT studies, and may reflect a local spinal or complex supraspinal analgesic mechanism. Registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12614000682640).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 22 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 23 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 27%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 28 33%