↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Another Time, Another Space

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Radiology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Another Time, Another Space
Published in
Academic Radiology, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.acra.2016.08.030
Pubmed ID
28193377
Authors

Alison L. Chetlen, Carol M. Dell, Agnieszka O. Solberg, Hansel J. Otero, Kirsteen R. Burton, Matthew T. Heller, Nikita Lakomkin, Stephane L. Desouches, Stacy E. Smith

Abstract

Virtual journal clubs (VJCs) provide a standardized, easily accessible forum for evidence-based discussion. The new virtual reality setting in which journal clubs and other online education events now take place offers great advantages and new opportunities for radiologists in academic medicine and private practice. VJCs continue to evolve, largely due to many emerging technologies and platforms. VJCs will continue to play an increasingly important role in medical education, interdisciplinary interaction, and multi-institutional collaboration. In this article, we discuss how to conduct and lead a critical review of medical literature in the setting of a virtual or traditional journal club. We discuss the current applications of VJCs in medical and graduate medical education and continued lifelong learning. We also explain the advantages and disadvantages of VJCs over traditional venues. Finally, the reader will be given the tools to successfully implement and run a VJC.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 30%
Unspecified 6 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 27%
Unspecified 7 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 15%
Engineering 3 9%
Psychology 3 9%
Other 6 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,632,909
of 12,481,104 outputs
Outputs from Academic Radiology
#705
of 1,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,221
of 361,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Radiology
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,481,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,195 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.