You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomics of adaptive evolution in the woolly mammoth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Biology, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2023.03.084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Díez-del-Molino, Marianne Dehasque, J. Camilo Chacón-Duque, Patrícia Pečnerová, Alexei Tikhonov, Albert Protopopov, Valeri Plotnikov, Foteini Kanellidou, Pavel Nikolskiy, Peter Mortensen, Gleb K. Danilov, Sergey Vartanyan, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Adrian M. Lister, Peter D. Heintzman, Tom van der Valk, Love Dalén |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 486 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 27 | 6% |
| Sweden | 22 | 5% |
| France | 13 | 3% |
| Germany | 11 | 2% |
| Mexico | 10 | 2% |
| Spain | 10 | 2% |
| India | 10 | 2% |
| Denmark | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 85 | 17% |
| Unknown | 240 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 314 | 65% |
| Scientists | 164 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2178. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,781
of 24,524,436 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#39
of 14,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104
of 389,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#3
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,524,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 60.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.