You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Free association ability distinguishes highly creative artists from scientists: Findings from the Big-C Project.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1037/aca0000545 |
| Authors |
Hannah M. Merseal, Simone Luchini, Yoed N. Kenett, Kendra Knudsen, Robert M. Bilder, Roger E. Beaty |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Greece | 1 | 5% |
| Israel | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,435,210
of 24,493,053 outputs
Outputs from Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
#107
of 522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,430
of 403,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 522 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.