↓ Skip to main content

Does the social equitability of community and incentive based conservation interventions in non-OECD countries, affect human well-being? A systematic review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does the social equitability of community and incentive based conservation interventions in non-OECD countries, affect human well-being? A systematic review protocol
Published in
Environmental Evidence, December 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13750-016-0078-3
Authors

Glenn Althor, Madeleine McKinnon, Samantha H. Cheng, Carissa Klein, James Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 26%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 13 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Unspecified 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2016.
All research outputs
#3,684,556
of 8,739,691 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#97
of 122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,037
of 299,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,739,691 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.