| Title |
Climate change and the global redistribution of biodiversity: substantial variation in empirical support for expected range shifts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, April 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-023-00296-0 |
| Authors |
Madeleine A. Rubenstein, Sarah R. Weiskopf, Romain Bertrand, Shawn L. Carter, Lise Comte, Mitchell J. Eaton, Ciara G. Johnson, Jonathan Lenoir, Abigail J. Lynch, Brian W. Miller, Toni Lyn Morelli, Mari Angel Rodriguez, Adam Terando, Laura M. Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 19% |
| Canada | 4 | 8% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Uganda | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 65% |
| Scientists | 16 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 38 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2023.
All research outputs
#767,840
of 25,617,409 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#20
of 332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,655
of 421,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,617,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.