↓ Skip to main content

Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypothermia for neuroprotection in children after cardiopulmonary arrest
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009442.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barnaby Scholefield, Heather Duncan, Paul Davies, Fang Gao Smith, Khalid Khan, Gavin D Perkins, Kevin Morris

Abstract

Cardiopulmonary arrest in paediatric patients often results in death or survival with severe brain injury. Therapeutic hypothermia, lowering of the core body temperature to 32°C to 34°C, may reduce injury to the brain in the period after the circulation has been restored. This therapy has been effective in neonates with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and adults after witnessed ventricular fibrillation cardiopulmonary arrest. The effect of therapeutic hypothermia after cardiopulmonary arrest in paediatric patients is unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 17%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 37 22%
Unknown 27 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 40 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,654,019
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,463
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,714
of 134,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#43
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.