You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Consumer feces impact coral health in guild-specific ways
Frontiers in Marine Science, April 2023
Carsten G. B. Grupstra, Lauren I. Howe-Kerr, Jesse A. van der Meulen, Alex J. Veglia, Samantha R. Coy, Adrienne M. S. Correa
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 281 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of||7||2%|
|Members of the public||252||90%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||9||3%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||5||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||2||12%|
|Student > Master||2||12%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||5||29%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||6%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 410. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
of 9,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 402,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
of 608 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 608 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.