↓ Skip to main content

Direct and Indirect Effects of Race and Socioeconomic Deprivation on Outcomes Following Lower Extremity Bypass

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgery, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
33 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct and Indirect Effects of Race and Socioeconomic Deprivation on Outcomes Following Lower Extremity Bypass
Published in
Annals of Surgery, April 2023
DOI 10.1097/sla.0000000000005857
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chloé A Powell, Jeremy Albright, Jacob Culver, Nicholas H Osborne, Matthew A Corriere, Devraj Sukul, Hitinder Gurm, Peter K Henke

Abstract

The goal of this study is to evaluate the potential pathway through which race and socioeconomic status, as measured by the social deprivation index (SDI), affect outcomes following lower extremity bypass chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI), a marker for delayed presentation. Racial and socioeconomic disparities persist in outcomes after lower extremity bypass; however, limited studies have evaluated the role of disease severity as a mediator to potentially explain these outcomes using clinical registry data. We captured patients who underwent lower extremity bypass using a statewide quality registry from 2015-2021. We used mediation analysis to assess the direct effects of race and high values of SDI (5th quintile) on our outcome measures: 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) defined by new myocardial infarction (MI), transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke, or death, and 30-day and 1-year surgical site infection (SSI), amputation and bypass graft occlusion. 7,077 patients underwent a lower extremity bypass procedure. Black patients had a higher prevalence of CLTI (80.63% vs. 66.37%, P<0.001). In mediation analysis, there were significant indirect effects where Black patients were more likely to present with CLTI and thus had increased odds of 30-day amputation (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.068-1.153), 1-year amputation (OR 1.083, 95% CI 1.045-1.123) and SSI (OR 1.052, 95% CI 1.016-1.089). There were significant indirect effects where patients in the 5th quintile for SDI were more likely to present with CLTI and thus had increased odds of 30-day amputation (OR 1.065, 95% CI 1.034-1.098) and SSI (OR 1.026, 95% CI 1.006-1.046), and 1-year amputation (OR 1.068, 95% CI 1.036-1.101) and SSI (OR 1.026, 95% CI 1.006-1.046). Black patients and socioeconomically disadvantaged patients tended to present with more advanced disease, CLTI, which in mediation analysis was associated with increased odds of amputation and other complications following lower extremity bypass compared with White patients and those that were not socioeconomically disadvantaged.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#134,454
of 24,312,464 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgery
#52
of 8,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,374
of 401,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgery
#3
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,312,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.