↓ Skip to main content

Neurovascular coupling: in vivo optical techniques for functional brain imaging

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurovascular coupling: in vivo optical techniques for functional brain imaging
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-925x-12-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lun-De Liao, Vassiliy Tsytsarev, Ignacio Delgado-Martínez, Meng-Lin Li, Reha Erzurumlu, Ashwati Vipin, Josue Orellana, Yan-Ren Lin, Hsin-Yi Lai, You-Yin Chen, Nitish V Thakor

Abstract

Optical imaging techniques reflect different biochemical processes in the brain, which is closely related with neural activity. Scientists and clinicians employ a variety of optical imaging technologies to visualize and study the relationship between neurons, glial cells and blood vessels. In this paper, we present an overview of the current optical approaches used for the in vivo imaging of neurovascular coupling events in small animal models. These techniques include 2-photon microscopy, laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), voltage-sensitive dye imaging (VSDi), functional photoacoustic microscopy (fPAM), functional near-infrared spectroscopy imaging (fNIRS) and multimodal imaging techniques. The basic principles of each technique are described in detail, followed by examples of current applications from cutting-edge studies of cerebral neurovascular coupling functions and metabolic. Moreover, we provide a glimpse of the possible ways in which these techniques might be translated to human studies for clinical investigations of pathophysiology and disease. In vivo optical imaging techniques continue to expand and evolve, allowing us to discover fundamental basis of neurovascular coupling roles in cerebral physiology and pathophysiology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 193 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Researcher 37 19%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 39 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 17%
Neuroscience 28 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 9%
Physics and Astronomy 8 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 44 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,778,730
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#195
of 867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,304
of 204,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.