You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Dutch Working Party on Antibiotic Policy (SWAB) guideline for the approach to suspected antibiotic allergy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Microbiology and Infection, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.04.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roos Wijnakker, Maurits S. van Maaren, Lonneke G.M. Bode, Maja Bulatovic, Bart J.C. Hendriks, Masja C.M. Loogman, Suzanne P.M. Lutgens, Ananja Middel, Chris M.G. Nieuwhof, Eveline E. Roelofsen, Jan W. Schoones, Kim C.E. Sigaloff, Aline B. Sprikkelman, Lieke M.M. de Vrankrijker, Mark G.J. de Boer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 375 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 56 | 15% |
| Spain | 29 | 8% |
| Mexico | 13 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 3% |
| Colombia | 8 | 2% |
| Japan | 8 | 2% |
| Chile | 7 | 2% |
| France | 5 | 1% |
| Thailand | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 58 | 15% |
| Unknown | 176 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 293 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 53 | 14% |
| Scientists | 27 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 41% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 246. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2023.
All research outputs
#147,410
of 24,972,914 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#51
of 4,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,126
of 353,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Microbiology and Infection
#3
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,972,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.