↓ Skip to main content

Association between high cardiac output at altitude and acute mountain sickness: preliminary study on Mt. Fuji

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physiological Anthropology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between high cardiac output at altitude and acute mountain sickness: preliminary study on Mt. Fuji
Published in
Journal of Physiological Anthropology, April 2023
DOI 10.1186/s40101-023-00322-7
Authors

Takeshi Ebihara, Kentaro Shimizu, Yumi Mitsuyama, Hiroshi Ogura, Jun Oda

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,922,670
of 23,868,111 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#140
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,717
of 401,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physiological Anthropology
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,111 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.