You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Discrepancies among ecological, household, and individual data on fruits and vegetables consumption in Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cadernos de Saúde Pública, December 2010
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0102-311x2010001100018 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rafael Moreira Claro, Patricia Constante Jaime, Karen Lock, Regina Mara Fisberg, Carlos Augusto Monteiro |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 81% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 1 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 13 | 81% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#248
of 1,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,802
of 190,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cadernos de Saúde Pública
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,855 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.