You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guideline adaptation and implementation planning: a prospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-49 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margaret B Harrison, Ian D Graham, Joan van den Hoek, Elizabeth J Dogherty, Meg E Carley, Valerie Angus |
| Abstract |
Adaptation of high-quality practice guidelines for local use has been advanced as an efficient means to improve acceptability and applicability of evidence-informed care. In a pan-Canadian study, we examined how cancer care groups adapted pre-existing guidelines to their unique context and began implementation planning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 23% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 18% |
| Psychology | 16 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 45 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,200,825
of 25,214,112 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#665
of 1,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,813
of 198,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,214,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.