You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Striking errors in the methodology, execution, and conclusions of the Cochrane Library review of spinal cord stimulation for low back pain by Traeger et al.
Pain Medicine, April 2023
Shravani Durbhakula, Mustafa Y Broachwala, Nathaniel M Schuster, Zachary L McCormick
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||13||62%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||14%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||10%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||100%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||100%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,846,849 outputs
Outputs from Pain Medicine
of 3,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 399,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain Medicine
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,846,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.