You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Open‐label parallel dose tolerability study of three subcutaneous immunotherapy regimens in house dust mite allergic patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, May 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-3-16 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Juliane Rieker-Schwienbacher, Marja J Nell, Zuzana Diamant, Ronald van Ree, Andreas Distler, Johan D Boot, Jörg Kleine-Tebbe |
Abstract |
The current maintenance dose (10,000 AUeq/monthly) of a subcutaneous allergoid for house dust mite (HDM) immunotherapy has previously shown significant clinical efficacy in patients with HDM induced allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis. In order to comply with the 2009 EMA guidelines on immunotherapy products, a study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability and short-term treatment effects of up-dosing regimens with high doses (up to 40,000 AUeq) of allergoid HDM immunotherapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 17% |
Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 39% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2013.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#577
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,527
of 205,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.