↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation, in three provinces, of the introduction and impact of China’s National Essential Medicines Scheme

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation, in three provinces, of the introduction and impact of China’s National Essential Medicines Scheme
Published in
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, January 2013
DOI 10.2471/blt.11.097998
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Li, Cui Ying, Guo Sufang, Philippa Brant, Li Bin, David Hipgrave

Abstract

To evaluate implementation of the National Essential Medicines Scheme (NEMS) in rural China.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 2%
Researcher 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,861,707
of 17,347,018 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#1,578
of 3,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,527
of 162,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#19
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,347,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.