↓ Skip to main content

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 1,396)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
786 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on literature search
Published in
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, April 2023
DOI 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irma Klerings, Shannon Robalino, Andrew Booth, Camila Micaela Escobar-Liquitay, Isolde Sommer, Gerald Gartlehner, Declan Devane, Siw Waffenschmidt

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 786 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 13 38%
Librarian 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 15 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 519. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#45,623
of 24,494,826 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#19
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,224
of 396,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,494,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.