↓ Skip to main content

Genome of the long-living sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.)

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
324 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome of the long-living sacred lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.)
Published in
Genome Biology, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ray Ming, Robert VanBuren, Yanling Liu, Mei Yang, Yuepeng Han, Lei-Ting Li, Qiong Zhang, Min-Jeong Kim, Michael C Schatz, Michael Campbell, Jingping Li, John E Bowers, Haibao Tang, Eric Lyons, Ann A Ferguson, Giuseppe Narzisi, David R Nelson, Crysten E Blaby-Haas, Andrea R Gschwend, Yuannian Jiao, Joshua P Der, Fanchang Zeng, Jennifer Han, Xiang Jia Min, Karen A Hudson, Ratnesh Singh, Aleel K Grennan, Steven J Karpowicz, Jennifer R Watling, Kikukatsu Ito, Sharon A Robinson, Matthew E Hudson, Qingyi Yu, Todd C Mockler, Andrew Carroll, Yun Zheng, Ramanjulu Sunkar, Ruizong Jia, Nancy Chen, Jie Arro, Ching Man Wai, Eric Wafula, Ashley Spence, Yanni Han, Liming Xu, Jisen Zhang, Rhiannon Peery, Miranda J Haus, Wenwei Xiong, James A Walsh, Jun Wu, Ming-Li Wang, Yun J Zhu, Robert E Paull, Anne B Britt, Chunguang Du, Stephen R Downie, Mary A Schuler, Todd P Michael, Steve P Long, Donald R Ort, J William Schopf, David R Gang, Ning Jiang, Mark Yandell, Claude W dePamphilis, Sabeeha S Merchant, Andrew H Paterson, Bob B Buchanan, Shaohua Li, Jane Shen-Miller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
China 3 1%
Japan 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 239 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 19%
Researcher 47 19%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 7%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 46 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 133 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 43 17%
Computer Science 4 2%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 55 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#403,803
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#210
of 4,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,751
of 205,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#3
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.